Non-Gender and One-Gender in the Gnostic Gospels (5)

Non-Gender and One-Gender in the Gnostic Gospels (5)

46 views
0

Archimandrite Theofilos Lemontzis, D. Th.

 

The above prohibitions should not be confused with instances where certain saintly women disguised themselves in order to enter men’s monasteries. What distinguishes these women from the followers of Efstathios is the reason behind their actions. Their motive was not to denigrate their sex nor to condemn procreation, as was the case with the repressive supporters of Efstathios, who were opposed by the Synod of Gangra. It was rather the social conditions of the time that compelled them to act as they did. These women entered men’s monasteries either because their families wanted to marry them off against their will (Saint Efrosyni, Saint Apollinaria); because they were being pressured into forming a relationship (Justinian and Saint Anastasia the Patrician); or because they wished to renounce their sinful past, as in the case of Saint Pelagia, who had formerly been a harlot. In such cases the outward appearance of being male allowed the disguised women entry into the life of monastic asceticism, and social masculinity made it possible for them to remain untroubled in their new persona for as long as it suited them. Through their cross-dressing, however, the women who were followers of Efsthathios rejected marriage and, as a concomitant, procreation.

We should mention that in his work De Civitate Dei, Saint Augustine also opposes repressive (‘encratic’) Gnostic tendencies similar to those adopted by the supporters of Efsthathios. These particular heretics claimed that, after the resurrection, women would be raised as men. Augustine firmly rejected these positions and stated that sex is a characteristic part of our nature and, as such, cannot be changed. In the general resurrection, therefore, women will be raised as women, not as men, because the distinction between the sexes is not something bad that must be abolished. What is bad is sin, decay and death. Indeed, he links all these notions concerning the change of sex after the resurrection with the various repressive, Gnostic concepts which condemn the body and its features, one of which is sex.

We should also mention that a literal interpretation of verse 19, 12 in Matthew (‘For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can’) led many Christians in the early years of the Church to castrate themselves. So it was that, from the mid-2nd century, we have instances of self-castration, removal of the genital organs on the initiative of the person concerned, despite the injunction from the Fathers of the Church that the spirit of the law should be followed rather than the letter (what was said in Saint Matthew’s Gospel) and that people should shun the example of Origen, the theologian who lived during the 2nd and 3rd centuries and castrated himself in order to restrain his passions.

Saint Epifanios also mentions a group of heretics who were called the Valesians. These particular heretics practiced self-castration, supposedly in conformity with the words of Christ that, if a part of your body was a stumbling-block, it was in your interest to cut it off so that you could enter the Kingdom of Heaven. So convinced were they of the correctness of their views that they castrated not only themselves, but also unsuspecting men who happened to be staying with them. Because of these practices of theirs, they ended up sexless, since, as Saint Epifanios points out: ‘they are no longer men because of what has been removed, nor can they be women, in defiance of nature’. What prompted these heretics to seek this no-sex state was the condemnation of the material body and therefore procreation. Their efforts, either to persuade everyone to castrate themselves, or to castrate them by force were inspired by a vision of the abolition of the material world and a life of spiritualism. This was foreign to Orthodox spiritual life. Their practice was opposed to God’s creative work and, as Apostolic Canon 22 states, such efforts are ‘an enemy to God’s creation’. According to Saint Epifanios, pursuit of such a non-sex state is ‘mental illness’ and a misinterpretation of the words of Christ, Who, while stressing the need for continence, did not mean to suggest that any member of the human body was evil, because ‘the procreative organs are made by God’.

Read the previous part here

Source: pemptousia.com

 

 

ABOUT THE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN NETWORK

Orthodox Christian Network (OCN) is a 501(c)3 and an official agency of the Assembly of Canonical Bishops of the United States of America . It is a recognized leader in the Orthodox Media field and has sustained consistent growth over twenty-two years. We have worked to create a community for both believers and non believers alike by sharing the timeless faith of Orthodoxy with the contemporary world through modern media. We are on a mission to inspire Orthodox Christians Worldwide. Click to signup to receive weekly newsletter. 

Join us in our Media Ministry Missions! Help us bring the Orthodox Faith to the fingertips of Orthodox Christians worldwide! Your gift today will helps us produce and provide unlimited access to Orthodox faith-inspiring programming, services and community. Don’t wait. Share the Love of Orthodoxy Today!

OCN has partnered with Pemptousia. A Contemporary post-modern man does not understand what man is.  Through its presence in the internet world, Pemptousia, with its spirit of respect for beauty that characterizes it, wishes to contribute to the presentation of a better meaning of life for man, to the search for the ontological dimension of man, and to the awareness of the unfathomable mystery of man who is always in Christ in the process of becoming, of man who is in the image of divine beauty. And the beauty of man springs from the beauty of the Triune God. In the end, “beauty will save the world”.

About author
avatar

Pemptousia Partnership

Pemptousia and OCN have entered a strategic partnership to bring Orthodoxy Worldwide. Greek philosophers from Ionia considered held that there were four elements or essences (ousies) in nature: earth, water, fire and air. Aristotle added ether to this foursome, which would make it the fifth (pempto) essence, pemptousia, or quintessence. The incarnation of God the Word found fertile ground in man’s proclivity to beauty, to goodness, to truth and to the eternal. Orthodoxy has not functioned as some religion or sect. It was not the movement of the human spirit towards God but the revelation of the true God, Jesus Christ, to man. A basic precept of Orthodoxy is that of the person ­– the personhood of God and of man. Orthodoxy is not a religious philosophy or way of thinking but revelation and life standing on the foundations of divine experience; it is the transcendence of the created and the intimacy of the Uncreated. Orthodox theology is drawn to genuine beauty; it is the theology of the One “fairer than the sons of men”. So in "Pemptousia", we just want to declare this "fifth essence", the divine beaut in our life. Please note, not all Pemptousia articles have bylines. If the author is known, he or she is listed in the article above.