Pemptousia and OCN have entered a strategic partnership to bring Orthodoxy Worldwide. Greek philosophers from Ionia considered held that there were four elements or essences (ousies) in nature: earth, water, fire and air. Aristotle added ether to this foursome, which would make it the fifth (pempto) essence, pemptousia, or quintessence. The incarnation of God the Word found fertile ground in man’s proclivity to beauty, to goodness, to truth and to the eternal. Orthodoxy has not functioned as some religion or sect. It was not the movement of the human spirit towards God but the revelation of the true God, Jesus Christ, to man. A basic precept of Orthodoxy is that of the person – the personhood of God and of man. Orthodoxy is not a religious philosophy or way of thinking but revelation and life standing on the foundations of divine experience; it is the transcendence of the created and the intimacy of the Uncreated. Orthodox theology is drawn to genuine beauty; it is the theology of the One “fairer than the sons of men”. So in "Pemptousia", we just want to declare this "fifth essence", the divine beaut in our life. Please note, not all Pemptousia articles have bylines. If the author is known, he or she is listed in the article above.
George Mantzarides, Professor Emeritus of the Theological School of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
The Orthodox Approach
It is natural that the theological approach to contemporary problems should be measured against perfection, which is the measure of Christ. But this measure, which Christians should always have before them, should not be converted into a sword to overcome those who are weak in the faith. Certainly Christian perfection is for everyone and should not be concealed from any of the faithful. But human weakness is common to all and we are not allowed to condemn anyone because of it. The Church has unlimited respect for human freedom and exhausts all its stock of lenient understanding in order to preserve it. The explicit opposition of the Church begins from the moment that people’s freedom is ignored and its sanctity is disdained. Nothing justifies forcing people to give tissue or body organs either before or after their death.
The human body is sacred. And it has to be respected not only when alive but also after death. It is not right that it should be treated as therapeutic material or as a store of spare parts. Nothing justifies the assumption of consent concerning the donation of body organs, much less acting on that assumption of consent just because there is no specific, written refusal. Finally, nothing legitimizes the dogmatic imposition of brain death as the sole criterion for the determination of the moment of death in the minds of those who see death as the mystery of separation or exodus of the soul from the body.
Orthodox theology usually does not provide specific rules for dealing with the problems of everyday life, but lays the foundations and notes the basic criteria which may have a variety of applications. It does so not because it prefers vagueness and ambiguity, but because it respects the truth and the person. If the approach to even inorganic material adopts the quantum mechanics of two mutually exclusive possibilities (wave/particle duality) and requires that the position of the observer must always be taken into account, how can it be thought satisfactory to take a one-dimensional and mechanistic approach to human persons and their health problems? The some objective fact may mean two diametrically opposite things for us.
The truth of the matter is not restricted to external formalities. Just as the removal of life can be an action of the greatest love (self-sacrifice) or an act of total self-limitation and ultimate despair (suicide), so transplanting tissues or organs from one person to another may be an action of great love or an act of contempt for the person or a final transaction. It may be a victory over death through the voluntary acceptance of death, but it may also be total submission to mortality, with the simultaneous removal of any spiritual element. Orthodox theology cannot accept the transplantation of tissues or organs from one person to another, or even just blood transfusions, as a mechanistic procedure. It can, however, accept them as acts of generosity and self-sacrifice. This is why it deals with the problem of transplants not with a rigid rule-book but on a case by case basis, the criterion being selfless love and respect for the person.
 See Rom. 14, 1
ABOUT THE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN NETWORK
Orthodox Christian Network (OCN) is a 501(c)3 and an official agency of the Assembly of Canonical Bishops of the United States of America . It is a recognized leader in the Orthodox Media field and has sustained consistent growth over twenty-two years. We have worked to create a community for both believers and non believers alike by sharing the timeless faith of Orthodoxy with the contemporary world through modern media. We are on a mission to inspire Orthodox Christians Worldwide. Click to signup to receive weekly newsletter.
Join us in our Media Ministry Missions! Help us bring the Orthodox Faith to the fingertips of Orthodox Christians worldwide! Your gift today will helps us produce and provide unlimited access to Orthodox faith-inspiring programming, services and community. Don’t wait. Share the Love of Orthodoxy Today!
OCN has partnered with Pemptousia. A Contemporary post-modern man does not understand what man is. Through its presence in the internet world, Pemptousia, with its spirit of respect for beauty that characterizes it, wishes to contribute to the presentation of a better meaning of life for man, to the search for the ontological dimension of man, and to the awareness of the unfathomable mystery of man who is always in Christ in the process of becoming, of man who is in the image of divine beauty. And the beauty of man springs from the beauty of the Triune God. In the end, “beauty will save the world”.